NDM 30/01/18

UK mass digital surveillance regime ruled unlawful

A man on his mobile phone walks past a CCTV sign

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/jan/30/uk-mass-digital-surveillance-regime-ruled-unlawful-appeal-ruling-snoopers-charter

The UK's Court of Appeal said that the (DRIPA) did not enough control officers access to individual data, including subjects' telephone records and web perusing history. As indicated by this article from The Guardian website, 3 interest court judges decided said that DRIPA needed protections like a supervisor, as it is conflicting with laws.

  • The court of appeal ruling on Tuesday said the powers in the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014, which paved the way for the snooper’s charter legislation, did not restrict the accessing of confidential personal phone and web browsing records to investigations of serious crime, and allowed police and other public bodies to authorise their own access without adequate oversight.
  • “The government must now bring forward changes to the Investigatory Powers Act to ensure that hundreds of thousands of people, many of whom are innocent victims or witnesses to crime, are protected by a system of independent approval for access to communications data. I’m proud to have played my part in safeguarding citizens’ fundamental rights.”
  • Watson launched his legal challenge in 2014 in partnership with David Davis, who withdrew when he entered the government as Brexit secretary in 2016.
  • The European court of justice ruled in December 2016 that the “general and indiscriminate retention” of confidential personal communications data was unlawful without safeguards, including independent judicial authorisation.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

LR

Identities: Feminist and gender theory

Applying Feminism